Two responses?

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Two responses?  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do my paper

1- Those for a cross-sectional design in relation to the perception of pain severity and quality of life in advanced care patients would argue that this design studies a specific group of individuals to understand their characteristics or relationships with each other. This would be beneficial to compare the relationship between how pain severity affects quality of life in advanced cancer patients. In the journal article Chronic pain: Its impact on the quality of life and gender, they explain “This indicates that these individuals experienced intense and debilitating pain that significantly impacted their ability to carry out daily activities, engage in social interactions, and maintain a satisfactory quality of life. Managing severe chronic pain often necessitates comprehensive treatment approaches to address the intensity of the pain and alleviate the associated physical, emotional, and social burdens (Pandelani et al., 2023)”. This cross sectional study concluded that intensity of pain affects quality of life and that the data correlates with each other with just comparison of individuals with chronic pain. In a quasi-experimental design exploring the relationship between pain severity and quality of life in advanced cancer patients, specific hypotheses play an important role in framing the research objectives and guiding the study. These hypotheses serve as explicit statements of what the study aims to test or confirm. For example, a specific hypothesis might propose that an intervention aimed at reducing pain severity (such as a new medication or therapy) will lead to significant improvement in the quality of life for the participating patients. Another hypothesis could suggest that the level of pain severity, when classified into different categories (e.g., mild, moderate, severe), will have varying and predictable effects on specific aspects of the patients’ quality of life, such as their ability to engage in daily activities or emotional well-being. These specific hypotheses in a quasi-experimental design help researchers focus their efforts, and assess the causal relationships between pain severity and quality of life while considering the potential impact of interventions or treatments. Its important to keep both of these experimental methods open for trial as they both could be uses appropriately to determine causal relationships between one another. Having an interprofessional team that are able to review and be involved in the study will better enhance outcomes and provide a more thorough evaluation for each step whether it be a cross sectional or quasi-experiemntal design

2-Whether the study is cross-sectional or quasi-experimental depends on how it is set up, its hypotheses, and its practical implications for the link between pain severity and quality of life in people with advanced cancer. The interprofessional team must work together to resolve these disparities. For a complete understanding, an interprofessional team must review and participate in the study. Those who choose a cross-sectional design may emphasize data collection. Cross-sectional studies acquire demographic data at one time (Setia, 2016). If data is collected at a specified time, the discomfort thought and quality of life study may be cross-sectional. The goal is to capture individuals’ views on pain and standard of life without influencing variables.

On the other hand, those who favor a quasi-experimental design may point out the study’s hypotheses. Quasi-experimental designs manipulate independent variables and quantify their impact on dependent variables (Maciejewski, 2018). This study may be quasi-experimental if scientists continuously test strategies or therapies, such as pain management approaches and quality of life. Hypothesis testing is more structured around particular hypotheses. To settle this dispute, the team must discover common ground. The study design may include cross-sectional and quasi-experimental features. Quasi-experimental methods can be used to look at and make sense of cross-sectional data collected at one point if treatments or measures are being tested (Maciejewski, 2018). Team talks can result in an arrangement that meets research goals. Potential methods for resolving the disparity could include conducting a thorough literature review to assess which design aligns better with the study’s objectives or engaging in open discussions to find a compromise that blends both elements. Collaboration can lead to a more comprehensive and robust research plan.

There are numerous strong arguments for including a team of specialists in the investigation. First, interprofessional teams bring various knowledge. In a diverse study like this, involving doctors, psychologists, nurses, and statisticians helps deepen understanding. Various experts may spot variables or concerns others miss, improving the study. Second, interprofessional teams boost the study’s external validity. Advanced cancer patients are part of a healthcare ecosystem (Khang et al., 2023). Involving specialists from varied backgrounds can help understand how healthcare methods, support networks, and psychological factors affect pain perception and quality of life. Understanding this can greatly enhance the study’s findings. A group of professionals can also improve study ethics. Diverse researchers can guarantee that the study follows ethical norms and protects those at risk, like patients with advanced cancer. They can address consent that is informed, the safety of patients, and harm with their unique viewpoints (Khang et al., 2023).