In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following

Description

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do my paper

PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS

Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use the most with clients presenting with addiction.
  • Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.

THE ASSIGNMENT

In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.

  • Provide an overview of the article you selected.
    • What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?
    • What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already studied?
    • What were the author’s claims?
  • Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
  • Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
  • Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
  • Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you used as the basis for this Assignment.

BY DAY 7

Submit your Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.•Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?What were the author’s claims?
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims.

 17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The presentation defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a description of the author’s claims.

 15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

There is an incomplete definition of the considered population…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims.

 13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomeo Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article…. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.

 22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article…. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.

 19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.

 17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.

 22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.

 19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.

 17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.

 8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides.

 7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies.

 6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide.
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.

 8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.

 7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide.

 6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The presentation is not supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, and/or the reference list is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

 4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

 3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

 3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

 4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disordersLinks to an external site. (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?u… and Psychiatric Diagnosis”
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.Chapter 9, “Motivational Interviewing”
Chapter 19, “Psychotherapeutic Approaches for Addictions and Related Disorders”

Explanation & Answer

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

Similar Posts

DQ 4-2 Analyzing Evidence-Based Practice Outcomes, health and medicine homework help

ByMagic

Description System Admin Max Points: 5.0 Conducting research projects while ensuring the protection of human subjects is necessary. What are some methods to protect personal rights of someone in one of the groups that is labeled as vulnerable? Justify your rationale. approx. 450 words 1 ref

Explain to Mr. Jones the life cycle of his insurance claim, discussion help

ByMagic

Description Mr. Alex just called because he is very confused about his new insurance. Prior to this Mr. Jones did not have any insurance but since the Affordable Care Act, he now has purchased a private policy. He needs you to explain what happens from the time he sees the doctor, receives treatment, to finding…

Exercise 13.3-Authority–Power Gap in the Student Role

ByMagic

Description You are a senior nursing student completing your final leadership practicum. Your assignment today is to assume leadership of a small team composed of the registered nurse (RN), one licensed vocational nurse/licensed practical nurse, and one certified nursing assistant (CNA). The RN preceptor has agreed to let you take on this leadership role in…

Imagine that you are the marketing manager for a healthcare organization, powerpoint presentation help

ByMagic

Description Imagine that you are the marketing manager for a healthcare organization. You and your team would like to create a marketing message to target the organization’s primary market. It is your job to convince the governing board to give your team the funds it needs to produce the message. Create a PowerPoint presentation of…