Rebuttals

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Rebuttals  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do my paper

• In your rebuttals, argue against the position they have taken. Provide evidence in your rebuttals- why do you oppose their viewpoint?
• You can choose a text response. Do not create new thread. Go into a thread and respond to the video by clicking Reply.
• No personal attacks or name calling. Add emojis if needed.
• Remember that tone comes across differently online and in text.
• Do not use all CAPS, and remember that the person’s stance may not be their personal views.
• Argue the evidence, not the person.
• Don’t forget to respond to comments on your own videos. (Comments will be provided in the order that peers start comment)
• Review the board and reply to students that do not have rebuttals yet. It is your job to keep your peers engaged and the debate lively with rebuttals!

Peer 1 Dahlia

Peer 2 Acosta

Peer 3: Hermes. Please find script below.

• presenting the ethics of drug pricing.0:03
• Why should drug companies should not charge whatever they want?0:12
• In the. The U.S. pharmaceutical companies can set the prices of drugs, whatever they believe will be profitable and the market will bear.0:18
• So nations like Australia and Germany utilize value based prices on making their drugs more valuable and cheaper for patients.0:29
• So I do not permit drug companies to chart what they want because of ethical and societal and economic reasons.0:39
• There’s a rationale for our stance behind that so that our ethical principles, economic considerations and societal implications.0:52
• Well, healthcare is not a privilege because it is a fundamental right.1:05
• There should be justice and fairness in prices. So having a fair price ensures that the cost of drugs is justifiable and reasonable,1:09
• and it isn’t ethical for drug entities to set prices that focus on exploiting suffering patients.1:18
• My stance advocates for justice and fairness in drug pricing.1:25
• The process should be controlled because of healthcare budgets or health care1:32
• systems incur significant costs as a result of expensive pharmaceuticals.1:35
• The price prices should be controlled to avoid the monopoly power of pharmaceutical companies.1:40
• And, you know, certain lifesaving medications are within the total control of those pharmaceutical companies.1:46
• And when a business has complete control over a center, certain good or service, it is unrestricted in its ability to raise prices.1:53
• Societal implications. We can mention that, you know, high drug prices have negative effects on public health.2:07
• When people cannot afford medications, they may decide against seeking treatment or delay, seek any longer, which can harm public health.2:17
• And if illnesses are not addressed, they may worsen impose greater health risk to everyone in society.2:27
• Um, so we can mention that the United Nations in 1948, um, when.2:38
• They created the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.2:46
• It contained the idea that access to health care should be regarded as a fundamental2:54
• right and everyone has the right to a reasonable quality of life in good health,3:00
• including access to medical treatment.3:07
• On equity and justice. Drug prices should be reasonable, and they should not discriminate against people based on their income or place of origin.3:12
• There is some monopoly power.3:25
• So due to their patents and exclusivity rights, several pharmaceutical companies,3:29
• they can set prices without being concerned about competition from other companies thanks to the monopoly strength in.3:34
• Lack of this competition leads to higher prices.3:44
• So the high cost of pharmaceutical creates a significant financial problem.3:49
• There are also some health disparities where vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected.3:57
• The impact of pharmaceuticals being expensive and out of reach of people who are vulnerable and disadvantaged.4:05
• Such as those who are low income or members of minority groups is greatest.4:15
• So this difference have the greatest detrimental effect on them.4:21
• And. Thus preventing them from receiving necessary medical care.4:25
• There is also a negative public health outcome.4:34
• So delay or foregone treatment due to cost.4:38
• Patients who cannot afford expensive medications may decide not to receive4:44
• therapy in resource decisions may worsen on which makes life more difficult.4:48
• And it raises the cost of health care in the long run.4:57
• It increases disease,5:03
• transmission and morbidity where the spread of diseases and the number of sick people can increase when people cannot access the necessary therapies.5:04
• And in consequence, communities may become less healthy as.5:14
• As a result. And some theories supporting the position.5:22
• So in this section, we shall discuss the moral principle that supports our conviction that medication5:30
• firms should not be allowed to charge exorbitant prices without limitations.5:35
• We will examine rules, theories of utilitarianism and justice.5:42
• So on Rawls Theory of Justice, according to this theory.5:52
• Fair resource distribution is crucial for society.6:03
• An equitable society is one where inequalities are accepted only if they benefit the least fortunate.6:08
• This notion contends that regardless, though, regardless of financial circumstances, everyone should have access to necessary medications.6:15
• The goal of roles theory is to eliminate disparities in access to health care.6:26
• It is unjust for everyone to have equal access to pharmaceuticals due to high prices, which is against the principle of justice and fairness.6:33
• Utilitarianism.6:47
• Well, we can mention that, um, according to the utilitarian ethical theory, the proposition is the one that would benefit society as a whole.6:50
• It makes sense to support reasonable drug prices from a perspective that prioritizes serving society.7:01
• The international drug price comparisons we can see on.7:15
• And the table that the United States typically charges substantially higher prices for medicine is done.7:22
• Other industrialized nations, according to to the table.7:29
• This significant discrepancy highlights the need for change and provides clear evidence.7:37
• There are also some economic studies that have demonstrated that it is more difficult for7:45
• people to access the health care they require when medicine prices are excessively high.7:53
• These may result in treatment delays and detrimental health effects.8:00
• There are also some patient stories were real life examples of individuals.8:13
• Explain. Struggling. Um. You know, the struggle.8:23
• Um. To afford medication. In conclusion, drug companies should not be allowed to set prices without regulation.8:27
• Understands is supported because of the economics, society and ethic.9:53
• Rational people have the right to access quality health care.9:58
• While companies should maintain the principle of justice and fairness.10:03
• And the prices of drugs should be linked to the benefits.

Peer 4 Mauricio. Please find script attached below.

• I’m going to talk. If all hospitals should be for non profit in this location.0:17
• I am against that. Whatever for profit or nonprofit hospital.0:26
• Hospitals are institutions in charge of that community’s welfare, and by providing medical care and people must have choices of money.0:33
• Most U.S. hospitals are nonprofit institutions.0:45
• However, we can deny that for profit hospitals provide many benefits that might not be found in nonprofit hospitals.0:49
• Hearing this feature, you can get an idea of how many hospitals.1:02
• Ah, for a nonprofit. How many for profit?1:08
• And the number government of operate a hospitals.1:12
• One of the reasons they are against nonprofit hospitals.1:20
• Number one, how expensive? Percocet costing more money to operate, often fewer medical specialties and limited services,1:24
• how less flexibility in the services they provide some billions of dollars in losses.1:35
• They also receive tax rebates and grants that in many cases have not invested back in health projects or patient care improvement.1:46
• Rather they use it. To pay more money to the board of trustees or CEOs.1:59
• But the money cannot be redistributed or allocated.2:10
• What is needed. So this created a bigger problem because doesn’t necessarily mean they losing money.2:16
• They might be earning a lot of money, but they still function as a nonprofit.2:26
• We also have the reason why for profit institutions are better for profits,2:34
• health care and what efficient in terms of employees investing in equipment.2:43
• And being more accurately using the resources for profit Hospitals are also more likely to offer parity in the services they provide for profit,2:53
• often more flexibility in their services.3:06
• For example, patients can choose from primary care physicians in hospitals for profit,3:10
• so more a significant proportion of Medicaid patients for profit hospitals offer better through analogy.3:17
• Markets to perform surgeries are less invasive and safer due to the technology they have to support their care.3:28
• For profit hospitals invest more in technology and finding more care, and also research toward newer medications and procedures.3:41
• For profit Hospitals also had the potential to serve as institutions, in other words, to work with community engagement.3:56
• Ethical considerations are important when providing care autonomy.4:12
• Which means respecting the wishes of patients so that their dynamic can be protected, been beneficial,4:18
• to seek to act in the best interests of justice, to navigate through the due process, to determine where the limits on health care lie.4:28
• Non moral efficiency. Investing may harm and determine how to avoid.4:41
• In conclusion, nonprofit hospitals and for profit hospitals are institutions that have the same mission to be the best health providers,4:51
• but that people are having for profit.5:03
• Healthcare institutions give people more access to technology, more choices and flexibility in the health care services they demand.5:05
• So for profit, hospitals have more than the just.5:16
• Over in nonprofits hospitals.5:22
• Just like in nonprofits, hospitals for profits, Hospitals also had the potential to serve as anchor institutions in other ways,5:25
• as institutions, white community can get involved.5:34
• Policy makers should grant the incentives to for profit hospitals to support community engagement.5:39
• But also policymakers could do reforms that change the way.5:47
• Hospitals that get paid to get better incentives to invest.5:56
• Back to that community and maybe get discounts for the services for a large number of policyholders.6:03
• And make a better health care system. Thank you.