This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemo TitleAn original title that hints at what is presented in the memo.
5 pts
Strong Title
The title is original and clearly connects to the content of the memo.
3 pts
Vague Title
Has a title but does not clearly refer to the content of the memo.
0 pts
No Title
No title is included
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroductory paragraph with a thesis statement.
10to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Introductory paragraph states the city to be analyzed, explains why you chose this city, and establishes a clear thesis statement.
9to >7.0 pts
Adequate
Introduces the memo, but lacks clarity in presenting the choice of city or in establishing the thesis statement.
7to >0.0 pts
Incomplete
Sets up the memo, but is missing either presentation of the city chosen or a discernible thesis statement.
0 pts
No Introduction
The essay has no discernible introductory paragraph.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCurrent Segregation PatternsDescription of ethnic and racial demographics and segregation in the year 2020
15to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Effectively describes the demographic and segregation patterns in 2020 using all of the following components: A) Population size and percentage of 3 largest racial/ethnic groups; B) Index of Dissimilarity between two largest racial/ethnic groups; C) Index of Isolation for two largest racial/ethnic groups; D) Description of distribution of racial/ethnic groups using Racial Dot Map.
14to >12.0 pts
Good
Describes the main demographic and segregation patterns in 2020 using all four required components, with only minor errors in the presentation and explanation of data.
12to >9.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Some description of the demographic and segregation patterns in 2020, but with either A) incorrect presentation or explanation of data, or B) missing one or more required component.
9to >0 pts
Incomplete
Description of demographic and segregation pattern is missing two or more of the required components.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistorical Segregation TrendsA description of how the segregation in the city changed between 1980 and 2020
15to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Accurately identifies two (2) changes in segregation patterns in the city between 1980 and 2020. Both trends are supported with data from the Index of Dissimilarity or the Index of Isolation. The meaning of the data is clearly explained.
14to >12.0 pts
Good
Identifies two (2) changes in segregation patterns in the city between 1980 and 2010. Both trends are supported with data from the Index of Dissimilarity or the Index of Isolation. The meaning of the data is explained. However, there are minor errors in the presentation or explanation of the data presented.
12to >9.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Notes two changing trends in segregation, and an attempt is made to support it with data. However, the data is not clearly presented and/or there are substantial errors in the explanation of the data.
9to >0 pts
Incomplete
Presents fewer than two changes in segregation patterns, and/or is missing any supporting data for the trend(s) identified.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation for SegregationUsing at least one idea from readings or lectures to explain the current patterns and/or recent trends in segregation in the city.
15to >14.0 pts
Excellent
A compelling explanation for current patterns and trends in segregation is offered. This explanation draws correctly on one idea or concept from readings and/or lectures, and the source of that idea is correctly cited.
14to >12.0 pts
Good
An clear explanation is offered for current patterns and trends, drawing on an idea or concept from readings and/or lectures. There are only minor errors in explaining or applying the concept, or in citation of the source.
12to >9.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Some explanation is offered for current patterns and trends, and an attempt is made to connect to readings or lectures. However, memo is missing a clear idea or concept, does not apply it correctly, and/or does not cite the source.
9to >0 pts
Incomplete
Little or no explanation is offered for current patterns and trends in segregation. Missing any connection to ideas/concepts from the course, and/or missing citation.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionA brief concluding paragraph that tells the reader the main takeaway of your analysis in the memo.
10to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Concluding paragraph clearly and succinctly presents the main takeaway of your analysis of segregation presented in the body of the essay.
9to >8.0 pts
Good
Concluding paragraph presents an important takeaway from your analysis, with only minor problems of clarity in the writing or connection to the body of the essay.
8to >6.0 pts
Needs Improvement
An attempt is made to identify a takeaway related to segregation, but lacks a clear connection to the analysis presented in the body of the essay.
6to >0 pts
Incomplete
Conclusion is missing, vague, or unrelated to the analysis in the body of the essay.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesInternal citations and reference page with full citations using Chicago Style.
5 pts
Correct Citation
At least one reading or lecture is cited in the essay. Internal citation and the reference section are complete and correctly formatted.
4 pts
Minor Errors
At least one reading or lecture is cited in the essay. Memo includes both internal citations and a reference page, but with minor errors in use or formatting.
3 pts
Incomplete
At least one reading or lecture is cited in the essay, but memo is missing either internal citations or a final reference page.
0 pts
Missing
No sources are cited in the essay.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality & Following InstructionsAdherence to formatting requirements, proofreading and clarity of academic writing.
5 pts
Excellent
All formatting instructions are followed. The memo is clearly written in formal academic prose, is well-organized, and contains no proofreading errors (typos, punctuation, etc.).
4 pts
Good
No more than one formatting error. Memo is well-organized and the writing is mostly clear. No more than 3 proofreading errors.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
More than one formatting error. Writing lacks clarity at two or three points. Memo contains more than 3 proofreading errors.
1 pts
Unclear
The memo is not written clearly and has major organizational issues. Formatting instructions are not followed.
5 pts
Over the last two modules, we have learned about some of the different ways that cities are divided along racial and ethnic lines. In Module 4, we considered the historical and contemporary forces that foster racial segregation in cities throughout the U.S. We also learned how to use data and mapping tools to examine current patterns and recent trends of racial segregation in different cities. In Module 5, we focused on how immigration shaped the urban spatial environment of South Florida, with a particular emphasis on the formation of the Cuban ethnic enclave and the divergent trajectories of later immigrant groups. In this memo, you are going to bring together the concepts and tools from these modules to construct your own description and analysis of racial and ethnic residential patterns in a city or area (of your choosing) within the South Florida urban region.
You memo will include three major components: 1) A description of current patterns of racial and ethnic segregation in the city you have chosen; 2) A description of the most important changes or trends in this segregation since 1980; and 3) An explanation, using ideas from the readings and lectures, of some possible causes of these patterns and trends.
To complete this assignment, you will be using the two data tools from Module 4, which you had a chance to practice with in the discussion board. The links to the tools are listed below. If you still have questions about how to use the tools or interpret the data, make sure to attend office hours ASAP.
Step 1: Choose a city or area within South Florida Urban Region (including Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties) that you would like to analyze for this memo. This can be a particular city (i.e. Boca Raton, Plantation, Miami Beach, etc.) or one of the metropolitan regions around the three largest cities (Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach). Note: Make sure to browse the Diversity and Disparities Project tool to make sure there is data for the city or metropolitan area that you want to study. Step 2: Using the Diversity and Disparities Project data tool, examine and take notes on the basic demographic data for the city you are studying. How large is the population? What are the three (3) largest racial or ethnic groups in the city? What percentage of the population did each group represent in 2020? Has that changed since 1980? If so, how? Step 3: Using the Diversity and Disparities Project data tool, examine and take notes on the current patterns of segregation (i.e. the 2020 data) between the two largest racial and ethnic groups. In particular, you need to focus on two kinds of data. The 2020 Isolation Index for each group, and the 2020 Dissimilarity Index between these two groups. This will give you three (3) data points that you will use to describe current patterns. For example, if the two largest groups in the city are Hispanic and Black, you will need the following three pieces of data: a) the Hispanic Isolation Index; b) the Black Isolation Index; and c) the Black-Hispanic Dissimilarity Index. Step 4: Use the Racial Dot Map tool, visualize current patterns of segregation in the city you have chosen. Take notes on how the largest ethnic and racial groups are distributed in the city. In which areas do members of each group tend to live? Are different neighborhoods clearly dominated by a single group, or are they inhabited by multiple groups? Are some of the areas of the city more integrated than others? Step 5: Using the Diversity and Disparities Project data tool, examine and take notes on how segregation patterns between the two largest racial and ethnic groups changed between 1980 and 2020. In the memo you will need to establish what you see as the two (2) most important changes to segregation patterns over this time period (and you must support this with data). You will likely observe multiple changes in the data, and the choice of which to focus on is entirely up to you. You may use either the dissimilarity index, the isolation index, or both to support your description of the change. Step 6: Once you have gathered all of this material, your last step is to think about why this city is segregated as it is. What ideas or concepts from Modules 4 and 5 will help you to explain the current patterns and historical trends you see in the data and on the map? It may be helpful at this stage to review your notes from readings, videos, and lectures, or re-read/re-watch any material you think will be useful. You are required to use and cite at least one (1) specific idea from the modules in your explanation. Step 7: Draft your memo, which should have the following components. a) an original title that hints at what you will present in the memo; b) an introductory paragraph that states the city you have chosen to analyze, explains why you chose this city, and establishes a thesis statement (i.e. the overall argument about segregation patterns in the city); c) one to two paragraphs in which you describe the demographic characteristics and current patterns of segregation in the city. (For this description, refer to your notes from steps 2-4 above.) d) One paragraph in which you describe two important trends in segregation between 1980 and 2020, and support them with specific data. (see step 5, above) e) One paragraph in which you draw on at least one idea from readings or lectures to explain the current patterns and/or recent trends in segregation in the city you have chosen. (see step 6, above) f) A brief concluding paragraph that tells the reader what the main takeaway of your analysis is. What have we learned from your paper about segregation in this city? g) A Reference page that includes full citations for any article(s), lecture(s), or video(s) that you used in your analysis. Since you are required to apply one idea from readings or lectures, there must be at least one source cited in this section. Make sure to use Chicago Style. (Note: the reference page does not count toward the overall word limit). Step 8: Proofread carefully before submission! You should check for three things: a) typos, incorrect punctuation, missing words, spelling and grammatical errors; b) correct reference format; and c) overall coherence of the memo Do I have a clear argument? Does my writing make sense? Does the body of the memo match what I said I would show in the introduction? Formatting Requirements (Follow carefully to avoid losing points): 1) Upload your final memo as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) or PDF file ONLY. 2) Include a header with your Name and Z number. 3) Word count: 800-1,200. This does not include header, title, or references. 4) Double-spaced,Times new roman
Memo 2 Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMemo TitleAn original title that hints at what is presented in the memo.
5 pts
Strong Title
The title is original and clearly connects to the content of the memo.
3 pts
Vague Title
Has a title but does not clearly refer to the content of the memo.
0 pts
No Title
No title is included
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroductory paragraph with a thesis statement.
10to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Introductory paragraph states the city to be analyzed, explains why you chose this city, and establishes a clear thesis statement.
9to >7.0 pts
Adequate
Introduces the memo, but lacks clarity in presenting the choice of city or in establishing the thesis statement.
7to >0.0 pts
Incomplete
Sets up the memo, but is missing either presentation of the city chosen or a discernible thesis statement.
0 pts
No Introduction
The essay has no discernible introductory paragraph.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCurrent Segregation PatternsDescription of ethnic and racial demographics and segregation in the year 2020
15to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Effectively describes the demographic and segregation patterns in 2020 using all of the following components: A) Population size and percentage of 3 largest racial/ethnic groups; B) Index of Dissimilarity between two largest racial/ethnic groups; C) Index of Isolation for two largest racial/ethnic groups; D) Description of distribution of racial/ethnic groups using Racial Dot Map.
14to >12.0 pts
Good
Describes the main demographic and segregation patterns in 2020 using all four required components, with only minor errors in the presentation and explanation of data.
12to >9.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Some description of the demographic and segregation patterns in 2020, but with either A) incorrect presentation or explanation of data, or B) missing one or more required component.
9to >0 pts
Incomplete
Description of demographic and segregation pattern is missing two or more of the required components.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistorical Segregation TrendsA description of how the segregation in the city changed between 1980 and 2020
15to >14.0 pts
Excellent
Accurately identifies two (2) changes in segregation patterns in the city between 1980 and 2020. Both trends are supported with data from the Index of Dissimilarity or the Index of Isolation. The meaning of the data is clearly explained.
14to >12.0 pts
Good
Identifies two (2) changes in segregation patterns in the city between 1980 and 2010. Both trends are supported with data from the Index of Dissimilarity or the Index of Isolation. The meaning of the data is explained. However, there are minor errors in the presentation or explanation of the data presented.
12to >9.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Notes two changing trends in segregation, and an attempt is made to support it with data. However, the data is not clearly presented and/or there are substantial errors in the explanation of the data.
9to >0 pts
Incomplete
Presents fewer than two changes in segregation patterns, and/or is missing any supporting data for the trend(s) identified.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation for SegregationUsing at least one idea from readings or lectures to explain the current patterns and/or recent trends in segregation in the city.
15to >14.0 pts
Excellent
A compelling explanation for current patterns and trends in segregation is offered. This explanation draws correctly on one idea or concept from readings and/or lectures, and the source of that idea is correctly cited.
14to >12.0 pts
Good
An clear explanation is offered for current patterns and trends, drawing on an idea or concept from readings and/or lectures. There are only minor errors in explaining or applying the concept, or in citation of the source.
12to >9.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Some explanation is offered for current patterns and trends, and an attempt is made to connect to readings or lectures. However, memo is missing a clear idea or concept, does not apply it correctly, and/or does not cite the source.
9to >0 pts
Incomplete
Little or no explanation is offered for current patterns and trends in segregation. Missing any connection to ideas/concepts from the course, and/or missing citation.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionA brief concluding paragraph that tells the reader the main takeaway of your analysis in the memo.
10to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Concluding paragraph clearly and succinctly presents the main takeaway of your analysis of segregation presented in the body of the essay.
9to >8.0 pts
Good
Concluding paragraph presents an important takeaway from your analysis, with only minor problems of clarity in the writing or connection to the body of the essay.
8to >6.0 pts
Needs Improvement
An attempt is made to identify a takeaway related to segregation, but lacks a clear connection to the analysis presented in the body of the essay.
6to >0 pts
Incomplete
Conclusion is missing, vague, or unrelated to the analysis in the body of the essay.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesInternal citations and reference page with full citations using Chicago Style.
5 pts
Correct Citation
At least one reading or lecture is cited in the essay. Internal citation and the reference section are complete and correctly formatted.
4 pts
Minor Errors
At least one reading or lecture is cited in the essay. Memo includes both internal citations and a reference page, but with minor errors in use or formatting.
3 pts
Incomplete
At least one reading or lecture is cited in the essay, but memo is missing either internal citations or a final reference page.
0 pts
Missing
No sources are cited in the essay.
<
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?
Description + Required Textbook : Eric Foner, Voices of Freedom: A Documentary History, vol. 2 (4th edition). I dont have a textbook so please make sure that you have it before we can work together + First, choose one of the primary sources from this week’s unit (either a document from Voices of Freedom or…
Description This activity addresses the following outcomes: Discuss the history of the western theater of the Civil War, including the major turning-points Using the readings as evidence, consider the following in a post of at least 250 words: What went right for the Union and wrong for the Confederacy in the West? Please explain your…
Description In examining the Darfur Case Study, it definitely appears that this conflict seems “to lurch from impasse to impasse.” Why is this the case? Please see attached if needed.
Description 1-The topic you choose must relate directly to the course. If the connection to the course seems unclear, make it clear in your paper. . 2-Clearly describe the psychological topic you are addressing and provide a brief description of what psychologists have learned about this topic. 3- Relate the topic to a few examples…
