Week 1 | Lesson 2 Discussion NUR3125

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Week 1 | Lesson 2 Discussion NUR3125  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do my paper

A woman has just been diagnosed with breast cancer. Her doctor tells her that while cancer is a multifactorial disease, she carries the breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1. One of her two identical twin 19-year-old daughters is afraid that she also may have inherited the gene (Chapter 4, Learning Objective 2, 3, 8).

1. What considerations would you give her daughter who is worried about inheriting the cancer gene?
2. What ethical issues are raised when one identical twin wants to know her genetic susceptibility to a disease and other does not?

Instructions:

1. Your primary post should be at least 200 words long and should include reference to the textbook or another course resource using APA 7th edition format. Case Study Discussion Rubric
   

   Case Study Discussion Rubric

   Criteria	Ratings	Pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues / Problems	20 ptsProficientIdentifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/problems in the case study. 15 ptsDeveloping ProficiencyIdentifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues/problems. 10 ptsInadequateIdentifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/problems in the case study 0 ptsNo Marks	20 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues / Problems	20 ptsProficientPresents an insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues/problems. Rationales are supported by strong evidence. 15 ptsDeveloping ProficiencyPresents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified. Uses weak evidence to support rationale. 10 ptsInadequatePresents a superficial or incomplete analysis of some of the identified issues. Rationales are not supported by evidence. 0 ptsNo Marks	20 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations on Effective Solutions / Strategies	20 ptsProficientSupports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and well documented evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective. 15 ptsDeveloping ProficiencySupports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument; demonstrates little engagement with ideas presented. 10 ptsInadequateLittle or no action suggested and/or inappropriate solutions proposed to the issues in the case study. 0 ptsNo Marks	20 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research Makes appropriate and powerful connections	20 ptsProficientMakes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues/ problems and the strategic concepts studied; supplements case study with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information. 15 ptsDeveloping ProficiencyMakes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between identified issues/problems and concepts studied; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research. 10 ptsInadequateIdentified issues/problems and concepts studied; demonstrates limited command of the analytical tools studied; supplements case study with limited research. 0 ptsNo Marks	20 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer Response	10 ptsProficientDiscussion response is comprehensive, accurate, and complete. Key points are clearly stated, explained, and supported. No grammar or spelling issues. 8 ptsDeveloping ProficiencyAnswer is accurate and complete. Key points are stated and supported. Minor grammar or spelling issues. 5 ptsInadequateAnswer is partial or incomplete. Key points are unclear. Significant grammar or spelling issues. 0 ptsNo Marks	10 pts
   This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines	10 ptsProficientDemonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Uses APA 7th ed. Correctly for citations and references. 8 ptsDeveloping ProficiencyOccasional grammar or spelling errors, but still a clear presentation of ideas; lacks organization. Uses APA 7th ed. Correctly for citations and references with minor issues. 5 ptsInadequateWriting is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines. Does no adhere to APA 7th ed. Guidelines. 0 ptsNo Marks	10 pts
   Total Points: 100