Writing.

Dennis Rodman and the Art of the (Metaphoric) Screen

Phase #1: You are about to experience truth — someone’s version of it. Some years ago a now-infamous incident occurred in the world of professional basketball. The participants included a basketball player, a referee, a cadre of players and coaches, and ten thousand or so fans. You are about to read two different accounts (or versions) of the same incident. You will likely see some differences between them, although the differences lay not so much in matters of “fact” as in the strategic use of metaphors and other rhetorical devices by which each account is given its particular rhetorical character. As you read them, consider the effect that each version is likely to have on audiences who did not actually witness the event(s), and, who experienced only a single written version.

Screen Version #1

Chicago Bulls forward Dennis Rodman faces yet another suspension by the NBA for his dangerous tirade in Saturday night’s game at Chicago. Rodman was ejected with 1:31 left in the first quarter after receiving his second technical foul. Rodman then proceeded to head-butt referee Ted Bernhardt, catching him just above the left eye. In typical fashion, Rodman then ripped off his shirt and stormed around the court, pausing briefly to knock over a water cooler in front of a group of stunned young boys before finally leaving.

Screen Version #2

Chicago Bulls forward Dennis Rodman faces a suspension by the NBA for his wild and theatrical behavior in Saturday night’s game at Chicago. Rodman was given his notice of leave with 1:31 left in the first quarter of Saturday’s game after receiving his second technical foul. Rodman appeared to have bumped an official during a heated discussion over the foul. Consistent with past heroics, and to the delight of the Chicago faithful, Rodman then removed his shirt as he paraded around the court before finally exiting stage left into his team’s locker room.

Phase #2: So, is Rodman a lunatic or some kind of anti-hero? Let’s look closer.

1. Read Both Versions Carefully: Begin by reading both versions of the incident carefully. Pay attention to the language used, the details presented, and any differences in tone or perspective.
2. Note Key Details: As you read, jot down key details from each version. This includes specific actions, descriptions, and any metaphors or rhetorical devices used.
3. Identify the Differences: Highlight or make notes about the differences between the two versions. Look for variations in how the incident is portrayed, including the use of adjectives, adverbs, and any attempts to influence the reader’s perception.

Phase #2: Analyzing Rhetorical Devices and Audience Impact

1. Metaphors and Rhetorical Devices: Identify any metaphors, similes, or other rhetorical devices used in each version. Consider how these devices contribute to the overall tone and characterization of the incident. For example, words like “dangerous tirade” vs. “wild and theatrical behavior” convey different images.
2. Tone and Perspective: Analyze the tone and perspective of each version. Determine whether one version portrays Rodman more negatively or positively. Note the choice of words and phrases that influence the reader’s perception.
3. Audience Impact: Consider the intended audience for each version. How might the differences in language and characterization affect the perception of the incident by people who did not witness it firsthand? Think about how the versions might appeal to different groups or perspectives.

Phase #3: Formulating Your Analysis

1. Compare and Contrast: Write a comparative analysis of the two versions, highlighting the differences in language, tone, and perspective. Discuss how these differences shape the reader’s interpretation of the incident.
2. Consider the Larger Context: Reflect on the larger context in which these versions were presented. Think about the potential motivations of the authors or sources behind each version. Consider any biases or agendas that might be at play.
3. Rodman’s Characterization: Address the question posed in Phase #2: Is Rodman portrayed as a lunatic or an anti-hero in each version? Support your analysis with evidence from the texts.
4. Audience Reception: Discuss how the differences in the two versions might lead to varying audience receptions. Consider how readers who did not witness the incident might form different opinions based on the versions they encounter.
5. Your Conclusion: Conclude your analysis by summarizing your findings and offering your own interpretation of how language and rhetoric can shape our perception of events and individuals.

Remember to provide specific examples from both versions to support your analysis, and consider the potential implications of these differences in perspective on public opinion and discourse surrounding the incident.